|
|||||||
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|||||||
Ron Fox, Sui Juris
207 North Farragut Street
Bay City, Michigan 48708
Cell phone: 989 450 7309
Pro Se
This page is www.lawyerdude.8k.com/6465.html
This page is mentioned on the Ron Fox page at www.lawyerdude.8k.com/ronfox.html
74th Judicial District, 18th Judicial Circuit of Michigan
1230 Washington Avenue, Bay City MI 48708.
People
v
Ronald Lee Fox
Case number: ______________
Document #6465 Version 1
Motion to Continue until Thursday 15 July 2004.
Statement of case.
Declaration regarding need for a continuance.
Argument and Memorandum of Authorities
Proof of Service
Time: 9:30 am
Date: Friday 11 June 2004
Place: Court of Judge Newcombe.
Motion to Continue until Thursday 15 July 2004.
To the prosecutor: Please take notice that at the venue designated in the caption, or at such other time and the court shall order, I will ask the court to continue this case until July 15.
Signed__________________ Ron Fox Thursday, June 10, 2004.
Table of Contents:
Declaration regarding need for a continuance
I must appear Monday the 14th in my other case.
This is my first case of being accused of failing to register. I have ordered the files from the jurisdiction where the underlying crime is alleged to have happened. I have not yet not received the files and therefore cannot explain the case to a lawyer. I need time for the files to arrive in the mail and time for a lawyer to review his case.
I am simultaneously being prosecuted for having my windows smashed out by the same officer who harassed me at his house around 20 times before eventually chasing my van slowly and then smashing out the window while I was parked in my own yard after driving home with the officer behind me.
I contend that the accusation is retaliation for my having filed a federal complaint. The overbroad statute invites just this very kind of unbridled discretion which is always used to further some agenda against persons who challenge the police.
Declaration regarding need for a continuance.
I, Ron Fox, declare the following under penalty of perjury:
When I was a child I was run over by a car injuring my head. Then later as a child I was run over by another car injuring my head. As an adult I fell from the 2nd floor - on my head. Those 3 head injuries cause me some problems. I did not learn to read until age 23 after finally being instructed by special teachers who understood my problem. In the year 1997 I went to Gramma’s funeral in St. Ignace county and while there I was falsely accused of a sexual crime. I was then factually innocent.
My lawyer told me to get the files for the underlying case.
I contend that my underlying case is void.
The sex registration act was is unconstitutional. It was unconstitutional ab initio. That is my legal opinion based on my reading and based on many discussions with lawyers. That has been my opinion from the beginning and especially since a Michigan federal court declared it unconstitutional on June 3, 2002. Here is a link to the opinion/ case declaring the law unconstitutional. http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/5441.html On February 23, 2004 (almost 2 years later) the federal court of appeal overturned the opinion of Judge Victoria Roberts regarding the unconstitutionality of the registration act - but my case is better than the case of Daniel Fullmer. January 15, 2004 is the date that the alleged crime happened.
This is a complicated case. One of my theories is that you cannot punish me for mistakenly believing that the statute is unconstitutional; a federal judge declared it unconstitutional. My lawyer says that it is unconstitutional and was void ab initio.
This law invites complication. I need time to do all things that I need to do to argue the issues - and I believe that I have a right to do that before I make a plea.
I must appear Monday the 14th in my other case.
I am dealing with two cases simultaneously here. The two cases have the common thread of being the product of a policeman “out to get me” . Grace Olech v Village of Willowbrook, et. al. (1998 7th circuit) www.lawyerdude.8m.com/5126.html 160 F.3d 386 and Esmail v. Macrane (7th Circuit 1995) 53 F.3d 176 both hold that ”out to get you" is actionable against a government.
The same policeman who broke out my car windows is the one who was at my house 20 times to harass me for being on the sex offender list.
I need more time than the average case because I am at the same time handling these two related cases plus a federal case for violation of my civil rights.
I have a file coming to me from the county where the alleged crime happened in 1997.
It would be a denial of Due Process for me to make an uniformed plea. I need effective assistance of counsel at all stages of the proceeding.
I would like for my counsel to be fully prepared and fully knowledgeable about the underlying alleged crime before I make a plea.
Also, if all goes well, I will have filed today a Motion to Dismiss in this case.
Signed__________________ Ron Fox. Thursday, June 10, 2004
Proof of Service
I, Gail Fox, declare the following under penalty of perjury: On Thursday, June 10, 2004 I served this motion #6465 at the office of the prosecutor. Thereafter I filed it at the criminal filing window. It was (circle one) rejected/ accepted and filed stamped.
Signed ________________ Thursday, June 10, 2004