|
|||||||
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|||||||
5742
This page is www.lawyerdude.8k.com/5742.html
Related links:
This page is mentioned on my disbarment page: http://www.circuitlawyer.8m.com/5453.html
General Navigation links:
Back to www.lawyerdude.8m.com
Back to Lawyerdude's discussion group: www.groups.yahoo.com/group/lawyerdude
Email lawyerdude: dlawyerdude@hotmail.com
Lawyerdude's links page: www.lawyerdude.8m.com/links.html
Back to lawyerdude's briefs: www.circuitlawyer.8m.com
Back to Lawyerdude's discussion group: www.groups.yahoo.com/group/lawyerude
Back to Lawyerdude's links: www.lawyerdude.8m.com/links.html
Back to "What's been uploaded lately by Lawyerdude": http://www.circuitlawyer.8m.com/5673.html
Back to Lawyerdude's Contemporary Constitutional Issues: http://www.circuitlawyer.8m.com/5693.html
The Steve 762 program to fight traffic tickets: http://www.circuitlawyer.8m.com/5695.html
Lawyerdude's latest briefs: http://www.circuitlawyer.8m.com/5690.html
Story of legal mistake by federal court clerks
leading to raid on my office.
Sunday, March 23, 2003 - my Dad’s birthday
In 1993 I was released after 10 months in jail for traffic tickets. I lost my nice office. Attorney Steve Pell, who has never been discipline, and his associates cleaned out my office and stole the best of my library, luxurious sheets and towels, and lotas goodies from my office. Having researched Ming 1. http://www.lawyerdude.8m.com/ming.html Theard, and Ruffalo, I knew the following:
"Though admission to practice before a federal court is derivative from membership in a state bar, disbarment by the State does not result in automatic disbarment by the federal court." - Ruffalo www.lawyerdude.8k.com/Ruffalo.html
" (a) While a lawyer is admitted into a federal court by way of a state court, he is not automatically sent out of the federal court by the same route. P. 281." - Theard www.lawyerdude.8k.com/theard.html
Izabell Katapodis Negligent Vindictive clerk whose error cost me my office
Admission is federal court was run by Izabell Katapodis an uneducated munchkin. I called her to verify my status with them. She said "If you are suspended with the state bar then you are suspended with us" That is a lie. It took some doing but I got on the phone with the chief clerk Leonard Brosnan. He eventually wrote an acknowledgment letter admitting that I told him about Ming. He promised to talk to chief Judge Manuel Real. I called Brosnan back as we agreed.
I have a letter from Brosnan admitting that I pleaded Ming and won.
Brosnan said that my license indeed could not be suspended summarily. Thereafter I set up and office, ran some expensive ads on credit, and resumed bankruptcy practice. Thereafter the local district attorney called Katapodis and she told him what she told me earlier. On the basis of that lie the investigators raided my office and took my computers, files, money, answering machine, and lots of stuff. Immediately at the raid I explained In Re Ming to them . They kept me in jail for 6 days but did not ever file a criminal complaint although they did accuse me of 7 felonies in a big story in the newspapers.
Similar pattern of oppression by vague behavior standards of bar
My case is very much like Ruffalo's and that of many lawyers. The bar gets them by crooked illegal methods based on overbroad statutes. The statutes foster unbridled discretion which leads to unwritten agendas which in the case of bar organization favor the corporations and government interests against the sole practitioner. In my case I won a case against R J Reynolds Tobacco for crashing into my car but they complained and got both my driver license and my bar license. had I known then what I know now I would have filed a SLAAP lawsuit. Their action was retaliations. Other complaints were from a corporate lawyer in town who defended some government officials in Indiana who I sued under Rico and 1983 in the Naked City case. All the complaints were controversial stuff that never passes constitutional muster of overbreadth, vagueness, due process , and other stuff but the bar wants to say that they need not use criminal protections. They are wrong. Thanks for reminding me. As you can see I am hitting some wrong keys. I am kinda jacked up about this thing.
See my disbarment page http://www.circuitlawyer.8m.com/5453.html