5731
Jehovah’s Witness Page.
Jehovah’s Witnesses litigated a disproportionally large number of cases.
They won cases that define our freedoms.
This page is www.lawyerdude.8k.com/5731.html
Related pages:
See also: My other Jehovan Witness page: http://www.circuitlawyer.8m.com/5716.html
This page is mentioned on is www.lawyerdude.8m.com/5459.html
General navigational links:
Lawyerdude’s most important page. His top 10 lists: http://www.lawyerdude.8m.com/5459.html
Back to www.lawyerdude.8m.com Or my mirror site: www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com
Telephone Lawyerdude: 805 652 0334
Back to Lawyerdude's discussion group: www.groups.yahoo.com/group/lawyerdude
Email lawyerdude: dlawyerdude@hotmail.com
Back to lawyerdude's briefs: www.circuitlawyer.8m.com
Back to Lawyerdude's Contemporary Constitutional Issues:
http://www.circuitlawyer.8m.com/5693.html
The Steve 762 program to fight traffic tickets: http://www.circuitlawyer.8m.com/5695.html
List of all pages uploaded by Lawyerdude in the past few months updated 27 June 03: http://www.circuitlawyer.8m.com/5673.html
Lawyerdude's links page: www.lawyerdude.8m.com/links.html
Jehovah's witness page.
Taken from http://atheism.about.com/library/decisions/indexes/bl_l_JWIndex.html
Cantwell v. Connecticut (1940) The Court ruled that the statute requiring a license to solicit for religious purposes was a prior restraint that vested the state with excessive power in determining which groups must obtain a license.
Minersville School District v. Gobitis (1940) In an 8-1 Court Decision, the Court ruled that a school district's interest in creating national unity was sufficient to allow them to require students to salute the flag.
Cox v. New Hampshire (1941) The Court unanimously upheld the convictions of Jehovah's Witnesses for engaging in a public parade without a license.
Jones v. Opelika I (1942) The Court upheld a statute prohibiting the selling of literature without a license because it only covered individuals engaged in an commercial activity rather than a religious ritual.
Jones v. Opelika II (1943)
The Court ruled the practice of charging a flat fee for people distributing literature was unconstitutional. The freedom of press was not to be restricted only to those who can afford to pay the licensing fee.
Douglas v. City of Jeannette (1943)
The Supreme Court refused to prevent the City of Jeannette, Pennsylvania, from threatening prosecution of Jehovah's Witnesses who were violating a law requiring the licensing of people selling books even while that law was being challenged before the Supreme Court.
Murdock v. Pennsylvania (1943) www.lawyerdude.8k.com/murdock.html
The Court found that the Jeanette ordinance requiring solicitors to purchase a license from the borough was an unconstitutional tax on the Jehovah's Witnesses' right to freely exercise their religion.
West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette (1943)
The Court ruled 8-1 that a school district violated the rights of students by forcing them to salute the American flag.
Follett v. Town of McCormick (1944)
Should people who earn their living by selling or distributing religious materials be required to pay the same licensing fees and taxes as are expected of those who sell or distribute non-religious materials? The Supreme Court held that such licenses are unconstitutional.
Prince v. Massachusetts (1944)
In a 5-4 Court Decision, the Court upheld Massachusetts' restriction on the abilities of children to sell religious literature.
Watchtower Society v. Village of Stratton (2001)
Should people going door-to-door for solicitations, canvassing, etc. be required to get a permit first? The Jehovah's Witnesses don't think so, and challenged just such a law in the Village of Stratton, Ohio. The 6th Circuit Court decided against them, but the case will soon be decided by the Supreme Court.
Major Sources:
The Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court of the United States. Kermit L. Hall, ed. Compare Prices
The Oxford Guide to United States Supreme Court Decisions. Kermit L. Hall, ed. Compare Prices
The Godless Court? Supreme Court Decisions on Church-State Relationships. Ronald B. Flowers. Compare Prices
The Godless Constitution: The Case Against Religious Correctness. Isaac Kramnick & R. Laurence Moore. Compare Prices
The Constitution and Religion: Leading Supreme Court Cases on Church and State. Robert S. Alley Compare Prices
The Supreme Court on Church and State. Robert S. Alley Compare Prices
Back To: Court Decisions on Religious Liberty (main page)
Groups who don't pay some taxes:
1. The major corporations use loopholes to defeat the purpose of the income tax.
2. Some groups have legally opted out of social security.
3. Congress has exempted some groups from social security, to wit: The Amish.
New Friday, July 26, 2002: Fact: Farmers did not have to pay social security until 1955 - and I believe that they felt left out until then. It is a good program if you want to join.
Amish
Congress has exempted some groups from social security, to wit: The Amish.
Amish don't have to pay social security tax. See this link. http://www.amishnews.com/amisharticles/amishss.htm
Amish don't have to send their kids to high school. See Wisconsin v Yoder.